Graphics Cards for High FPS (144Hz & 240Hz) Gaming (2020)

The next revolution in graphics cards is already here. 6-core, 8-core and 10-core graphics cards are becoming cheaper than ever to manufacture, while also offering much higher performance. With these new behemoths at hand, what should gamers look forward to?

The “144hz graphics card” is a graphics card that can be used for high-frame-rate (144Hz) gaming. The next generation of these cards will come out in 2020.

GPU for 144Hz and 240Hz gaming at high frame rates

Monitors having a refresh rate of 144 Hz or higher are no longer uncommon.

You’ll need a really powerful graphics card to attain the best frame rates for this.

Even on high-end GPUs, FPS exceeding 144 Hertz can frequently only be reached with severe visual losses, according to the test.

It was sometimes an issue of whether a game would run at all before the millenium, and even at 30 FPS, there was discussion of very excellent playability.

With the introduction of Full-HD screens with a 60 Hertz refresh rate as standard, 60 frames per second (FPS) or higher rapidly became the benchmark to beat.

With disabled Vsync, higher frame rates still provided benefits in control, but nothing changed in the real “game experience.”

Because gaming monitors now available with 144 Hz and sometimes even higher refresh rates, the benefits on comparable screens are considerably greater.

Of course, the impact varies greatly depending on the game, but at three-digit frame rates, rapid games with direct control may allow for a lot more game flow.

There are now two ways to get more than 60 frames per second.

A variable refresh rate (Adaptive Sync (FreeSync) or G-Sync) is particularly useful since the frame rate doesn’t have to be as high and the display remains synced with the graphics card’s picture output throughout.

This also has the benefit of maintaining a high degree of visual quality.

It’s essentially a bonus if the PC can support greater frame rates.

The goal is for all games to have a frame rate of at least 144 frames per second.

The alternative option is to constantly be as near to, if not exactly above, a monitor’s maximum refresh rate, at the sacrifice of graphical quality.

If a screen can run at 144 Hz, for example, the frame rate should always be near or slightly over 144 FPS.

However, contemporary games’ visual quality must be decreased, often dramatically, and the demands on the graphics card remain considerable.

This should not be done in AAA games below the current GPU upper class, with notable exceptions such as the visually undemanding long runner Counter-Strike: GO.

This article focuses on the titles that are more difficult to complete.

For this job, the majority of graphics cards quickly fail.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT (Radeon RX 5700 XT) (Radeon RX 5700 XT) (Radeon RX 5700 XT) (Radeon RX 5700 XT), Super GeForce RTX 2070, RTX 2080 Ti (RTX 2080 Ti (RTX 2080 Ti (RTX 2080 Ti (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti)))), GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti) (GeForce GTX 1080 Ti), and Super GeForce RTX 2070 must all pass the test.

Furthermore, it is unclear if there are any discrepancies in the distances between the various models.

Traditional GPU testing had distinct criteria.

The criteria are much different from those of traditional graphics card testing.

Instead of constantly loading the test subjects with the highest resolution and details, it is now required that they utilize all of the installed units to their full capacity, even with lower resolution and details.

In order to reach high frame rates, graphics cards must also be able to deal with a rising CPU limit.

The exam will reveal how effectively the four applicants handle this.

The gaming system, graphics cards, and test system

The following graphics card benchmarks were conducted using the default settings on an Intel Core i9-9900K processor.

The test machine can access up to 32 GB of RAM at DDR4-3200 speeds (14-14-14-32).

The Windows June 2020 Update (Version 1909) is installed, along with all applicable fixes.

The drivers were Adrenalin 20.4.2 and GeForce 442.87.

Radeon RX 5700 XT, GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, Super GeForce RTX 2070, and GeForce RTX 2080 Ti are the graphics cards.

All four versions are designed to operate with AMD or Nvidia’s standard requirements.

The settings for the games

For the benchmarks, the paper examined seven games, all of which were chosen because they obviously benefit from a high frame rate.

Borderlands 3 is a third-person shooter game. is a third-person shooter game. is a third-person shooter game. is a third-person shooter game. is a third-person shooter game., Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Destiny 2, Eternal Doom, F1 2019, Fortnite, and Tomb Raider: Shadow of the Tomb Raider are among the titles, which are a mix of first-person shooter, action, and racing games, as well as AAA and e-sports titles.

Even with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, the highest visual settings seldom achieve the needed frame rates.

As a result, the test’s degree of information has been drastically lowered.

On the Super GeForce RTX 2070, the aim was to achieve close to the target frame rates.

The precise parameters are shown in the table below.

On first sight, it’s clear that the visual quality has to be drastically decreased practically throughout.

Benchmarks in Full HD at 144 frames per second

The final results of the benchmarks deviate from the norm due to the modified requirement profile.

Thus, even at 1,920 x 1,080 with decreased visual details and the intended 144 FPS, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super is quicker than the Radeon RX 5700 XT by up to 3%, although the margin is generally 10% with a substantially higher GPU load.

In the meanwhile, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super is 2% quicker than the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, which is in the middle of the pack.

In addition, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is 27% quicker than the lesser Turing card, which is the standard difference.

If you look at the games available, you’ll see that the test track doesn’t favor AMD or Nvidia graphics cards.

The outcome may reportedly be explained by the lower graphical details and the resultant altered demands on the GPU, since the CPU does not seem to play a very important role – else the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti would have had to run into severe issues.

In terms of the CPU, it doesn’t play a part in the overall situation, although it does in certain circumstances.

For example, in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, the graphics cards reach a CPU limit, with the Radeon RX 5700 XT emerging as the clear winner.

In this situation, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti performs similarly.

However, the given title is not the explanation for the rating result, since nothing changes in the shrinking intervals if it is removed from the final result.

Is it fast enough to play Full HD at 144 frames per second with lower details?

Benchmarks in Full HD at 240 frames per second

In order to attain 240 frames per second in 1920 x 1080, the visual details must be reduced nearly entirely.

Then the Core i9-9900K utilized to load the GPUs has to work harder than normal.

As a result, the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is only roughly 13% quicker in this scenario than the GeForce RTX 2070 Super, and only 9% faster in frametimes.

As a quasi-compensation, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super can separate itself from the Radeon RX 5700 XT by 5%, while the difference is still tiny.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is on par with the AMD accelerator in terms of performance.

Not only Shadow of the Tomb Raider is now CPU-limited in individual games, but Borderlands 3, Destiny 2, F1 2019, and Fortnite are all affected, despite some scaling across the goods.

However, in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Eternal Doom, the graphics card is the sole component that determines performance.

Is it fast enough for Full HD @ 240 FPS with a lot of compression?

Benchmarks in WQHD at 144 frames per second

The GPU load rises again in the benchmarks at 2,560 1,440 with a target of 144 FPS.

This is owing to the improved resolution as well as the somewhat increased visual details.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Ti thus has a 24 percent advantage over the GeForce RTX 2070 Super, is 4 percent quicker than the Radeon RX 5700 XT, and is within the test’s normal range.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti produces the same number of frames per second as the AMD graphics card.

However, if you wish to maintain three-digit frame rates throughout WQHD, the CPU restriction still applies.

The processor slows down the graphics cards in Destiny 2, and the worst-case scenario, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, is still entirely reliant on the CPU.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT continues to outperform the competition, placing itself barely ahead of the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti once again.

Is WQHD at 144 FPS with substantially reduced details fast enough?

Benchmarks in Ultra HD at 144 frames per second

Despite the lowest graphical resolution level, there is a GPU limit in 3,840 2,160, which is why the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti can outperform the GeForce RTX 2070 Super by 25%.

With so many pixels, the GeForce RTX 2070’s advantage over the Radeon RX 5700 XT settles around 7%, which isn’t quite the traditional “AAA distance,” but it’s getting there.

And, believe it or not, the GPU has a little more influence in resolution in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti outperforming the GeForce RTX 2070 Super by 21%.

Although the difference from the Radeon RX 5700 XT is just 19 percent, there is nevertheless a difference.

Is it fast enough for Ultra HD at 144 frames per second with drastically decreased details?

Conclusion

Model

GeForce RTX 2080Ti from Nvidia

Super Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070

Radeon RX 5700 XT from Gigabyte

Result of the Test

June 2020 Result of the Test 9.9/10 Excellent

June 2020 Result of the Test 9.7/10 Very Good

June 2020 Result of the Test 9.4/10 Excellent

Pros

• Capable of 4K gaming at 60 frames per second
• Another fascinating feature with a lot of promise is DLSS.
• It raises the bar for single-GPU performance.
• Excellent connections

• Other RTX GPUs are less expensive.
• Memory capacity has increased and is now quicker than before.
• For older displays, there’s a DVI port.
• Overclocked to the max

• Great 1440p graphics performance in the mid-range
• Large performance boost, beating the RTX 2070 and approaching the Radeon VII.
• Excellent design
• The best value-for-money

Cons

• The 2070 Super work is louder thanks to Ray tracked games.

4K Resolution Winner (240Hz)

Model

GeForce RTX 2080Ti from Nvidia

Test Result

June 2020 Test Result 9.9/10 Excellent

Pros

• Capable of 4K gaming at 60 frames per second
• Another fascinating feature with a lot of promise is DLSS.
• It raises the bar for single-GPU performance.
• Excellent connections

Excellent for WQHD (1440p & 144Hz)

Model

Super Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2070

Test Result

June 2020 Test Result 9.7/10 Very Good

Pros

• Other RTX GPUs are less expensive.
• Memory capacity has increased and is now quicker than before.
• For older displays, there’s a DVI port.
• Overclocked to the max

Cons

• The 2070 Super work is louder thanks to Ray tracked games.

FHD is the best (1080p & 144Hz)

Model

Radeon RX 5700 XT from Gigabyte

Test Result

June 2020 Test Result 9.4/10 Excellent

Pros

• Great 1440p graphics performance in the mid-range
• Large performance boost, beating the RTX 2070 and approaching the Radeon VII.
• Excellent design
• The best value-for-money

Even at Full HD with a very powerful graphics card, 144 FPS in visually more complex games isn’t a self-runner.

Of course, there are games that may attain such high frame rates (without difficulties) even with high visual qualities; the benchmark series on famous online multiplayer games covers a variety of them.

They must, however, be lowered – and in some cases dramatically – in titles that are not already “ex works” intended for the lowest feasible criteria.

If you want to play at consistently high frame rates, you’ll need a powerful graphics card in addition to the suitable display.

Except for Counter-Strike: GO, you should instantly upgrade to a high-end model if you want to play at least 240 FPS in 1,920 1,080 or 144 FPS in 2,560 1,440.

As a result, the number of graphics cards available is quite restricted. At the very least, the editors suggest a GeForce RTX 2070 Super or a Radeon RX 5700 XT.

Clearly, variable refresh rates are more feasible.

If you employ variable refresh rates and don’t wish to attain 144 FPS or more throughout, on the other hand, you may be considerably more casual.

Because more than 60 frames per second can be readily reached in WQHD at higher quality levels without the use of a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, more than 60 FPS can be easily achieved in WQHD at higher detail levels without the use of a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti.

As a result, the editorial team also recommends this strategy.

Apart from Ultra HD, frame rates between 60 and 144 FPS are often attainable without difficulties or with minor visual limitations, and this is the range in which most superior G-Sync or FreeSync displays function nowadays.

The high frame rates are only beneficial if the emphasis is on a single game for which dedicated hardware can be obtained.

144 FPS or higher is unrealistic for a bigger range of games and has various drawbacks.

When playing at high frame rates, however, a fast CPU is required in addition to a powerful graphics card.

Even though the test didn’t concentrate on it, it proves that the CPU is equally as crucial as the GPU, particularly for Full HD at 240 FPS.

So, if you’re aiming for the maximum FPS with the fewest details, RAM-OC may be a game-changer in the end.

On the other hand, in a scenario with 144 FPS in Full HD, WQHD, and Ultra HD, the graphics card plays a larger role, although its need profile changes dramatically from traditional gaming with high details at roughly 60 FPS.

The distances have shifted somewhat.

There are also changes in the rankings as a result of this.

In every test situation, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super outperforms the Radeon RX 5700 XT.

However, the AMD graphics card seems to comply with the requirements a little better than the comparable Nvidia goods, since the difference is narrower than normal.

This might be due to a variety of factors.

Better usage of the execution units with low visual details, better utilization of the units as the CPU limit increases, or graphic details that the Radeon dislikes and so does not need to be computed are all possibilities.

Whatever the case may be, the behavior is present in all test games and hence is not an exception.

Buyer’s Guide to Graphics Cards: What You Should Know

In the graphics card business, AMD and Nvidia are inextricably linked.

So far, so straightforward – but then things become complex.

AMD and Nvidia graphics processors (GPUs) are found in a wide range of graphics cards, with costs ranging from under $100 to well over $1,000.

Furthermore, there are certain product names that are quite similar, as well as obscure technical terminology.

Here’s where our graphics card buying guide for 2020 kicks in:

We show you where to look for the best graphics card in each price range, as well as which equipment characteristics are most significant.

What to Look for When Purchasing a Graphics Card

We focus on GPUs in our buying advise since graphics card manufacturers such as Asus, Gigabyte, MSI, and Sapphire are unable to alter the GPUs’ core architecture.

The suppliers, on the other hand, are not unimportant: after a certain GPU has been picked, they come back into play.

The graphics card’s performance is then determined by factors like as clock speed and memory capacity, which is why we pay special attention to this in our recommendations.

There are additional advantages as well, such as the cooling system and power usage.

The latter is necessary to determine if the graphics card can be powered by the PC’s built-in power supply.

The memory kind, on the other hand, may be left off of the shopping list.

Even today’s entry-level cards use the fast GDDR5-RAM (Graphics Double Data Rate) memory, which is specifically intended for graphics accelerators and can attain memory bandwidths of 100 GB/s or even more.

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050, at “only” 84 GB/s, is the single outlier in the market overview.

However, since the memory bandwidth is already so large, there is no performance loss owing to allegedly sluggish RAM.

You also don’t need to give the CPU a high priority.

For example, depending on the TItel, a cheap entry-level CPU like the AMD Ryzen 5 1500X (about 140 Dollar) may be adequate to play comfortably with a high-end graphics card in a 4K resolution.

Maximum refresh rates are only required at lesser resolutions like as Full HD, hence the most costly option is really unnecessary. The CPU and GPU must then be top-of-the-line.

Nvidia RTX with raytracing is now on the market.

Radeon RX 500 (Polaris architecture) and Radeon RX Vega (Vega architecture) are AMD’s latest GPU versions, both of which have been available since mid-2017.

Nvidia first released its GPUs in the still-current GeForce 10 series (Pascal architecture) in mid-2016, but the GeForce 20 series arrived in autumn 2018 with a breath of new air.

But AMD isn’t resting on its laurels, as rumor has it that a new iteration of the Polaris GPUs will be released in November.

In addition to the new GDDR6 memory type, the three available GeForce 20 graphics cards, the RTX 2070, RTX 2080, and RTX 2080 Ti, include two characteristics that are particularly appealing to gamers: Deep Learning Super Sampling (DLSS) is an AI-assisted edge smoothing approach that uses specific ray tracing computation kernels to produce more realistic lighting and shadows in real time.

However, since nearly no game supports the unique features of the pricey GeForce 20 cards, which are all in the high-end class, gamers have no need for them right now.

Battlefield 5, which was launched in mid-November and uses the Geforce RTX’s real-time ray tracing, is one of the rare exceptions.

AMD vs. Nvidia: A comparison between FreeSync and G-Sync

AMD and Nvidia compete with their products on a level playing field in terms of price and performance, but they may also offer particular benefits to the field in addition to industry standards like HDR compatibility.

Depending on your system settings, the replacement graphics card may automatically arrive from just one of the two providers.

This can be observed in the Adaptive Sync technique, which is a highly significant function of the graphics card for gamers.

Modern graphics cards use Adaptive Sync to dynamically adjust their frame rate to the monitor’s refresh rate, reducing jitter and other distracting effects like tearing.

AMD’s pixel accelerators use the adaptive sync technology FreeSync, which competes with Nvidia’s G-Sync.

Both work on the same idea, but they need different monitors and are incompatible with one other.

If you’re using a display that supports Nvidia G-Sync, an AMD graphics card isn’t worth it since it won’t be able to take use of its FreeSync advantage.

Only an AMD graphics card, on the other hand, may be utilized as a video player with a FreeSync-compatible display.

Both sync techniques are compatible with both manufacturers’ entry-level devices.

Nvidia’s lone drawback is this:

G-Sync monitors are more costly and less common than screens that use the license-free FreeSync technology.

The “120 fps graphics card” is a type of graphics card that allows for the best in-game performance. It is expected to be released in 2020.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can any graphics card run 144Hz?

A: Not all graphics cards can run 144Hz. Snappy is a requirement for achieving this framerate, so if you are looking to game on high settings in Beat Saber PSVR, then your card will need to be powerful enough for that.

What graphics card can run 2k 144Hz?

A: The graphics card that can run 144Hz is a GeForce GTX 1080, so this would be the best one. If you have something else, it will need to be upgraded with an upgrade kit from Nvidia or AMD.

What GTX can run 144Hz?

A: Any GTX is able to run 144Hz, but the most common among gamers are either a GTX 1070 or an RTX 2080.

Related Tags

• graphics card for warzone 144hz
• best budget gpu for 1080p 144hz
• best graphics card for 1080p 144hz 2020
• best graphics card for 1080p 144hz reddit
• best graphics card for 1440p 144hz